Welcome to The Daily Scholar for June 11, 2026.

In today's issue:

  • The forgotten naturalist Humboldt called his teacher

  • Benjamin Saltzman on why turning away from suffering can be a form of attention

  • A fresh review revisits who controls the American literary archive

  • Dave Eggers asks who gets to call themselves an artist

  • Matthew Parker's library, and a rule that would forfeit the whole collection over a few missing books

Before we jump into it, an important announcement:

For the past 9 months, we’ve been quietly piloting our most ambitious program to date.

We’ve built a One-Year Program that represents the Indie Scholar alternative to a One-Year Master’s degree.

It’s about 10% the price of an average MA in the humanities or social sciences.

For the first time, we’re accepting applications from the general public, for the next batch that will begin on the first Thursday of next month.

If you’ve ever thought about doing a 1-year MA program—or you’d like to work on an ambitious longform research and writing project with professional support and a tight-knit group, apply here.

Top Stories

Untitled (Still Life with Lobster) by Jan Matulka (1930)

The Naturalist Humboldt Called His Teacher

Andrea Wulf's The Invention of Nature (2015) positioned Alexander von Humboldt as the founder of ecological thinking, the man who first understood nature as one interconnected living system. Her new biography, The Traveler, argues that Humboldt learned that idea from someone else. George Forster (1754–1794) sailed on Cook's second voyage as a teenage assistant naturalist and wrote A Voyage Round the World. He taught Humboldt to see nature as one connected whole. Humboldt later called it "a magic net of countless threads," where every element connects to every other. Humboldt at 88 still told people what he owed "to my teacher and friend George Forster." John Kaag's review in the Boston Globe frames the book as a necessary corrective: the man Wulf's earlier work celebrated as the originator was himself a disciple.

Forster's life outside the voyage was equally consequential. He challenged Kant's armchair claims about racial hierarchy, arguing directly against a philosopher who had never left his birthplace. He joined the Jacobin Club, led the short-lived Mainz Republic, and went to Paris as a diplomat. He died there in 1794 at 39, in poverty and political estrangement.

A Word from Our Sponsor

Free email without sacrificing your privacy

Gmail tracks you. Proton doesn’t. Get private email that puts your data — and your privacy — first.

Odds and Ends

Turning Away as a Form of Attention

White Crucifixion (1938) by Marc Chagall

Benjamin Saltzman, a literary scholar at the University of Chicago, has published Turning Away: The Poetics of an Ancient Gesture (University of Chicago Press). The book traces gestures of aversion across art and literature from antiquity to the present. These gestures include covering the eyes and lowering the head. Saltzman's central argument is that turning away is not necessarily indifference. Blocking the senses turns attention inward. In art and literature, the figures who cover their eyes are usually the most deeply engaged with suffering. In Chagall's Crucifixion paintings, for instance, figures cover their eyes with the right hand, the hand used in Jewish practice to recite the Shema. That word means "to listen." The gesture clears the senses so the person can pay attention more fully.

Saltzman rejects the contemporary slogan "Don't look away." He argues that insisting on unflinching attention may rather produce moral paralysis and apathy.

Before you go

If you took something from this newsletter, do one of the following:

  • Forward it to one person who needs to read it.

  • Reply with a correction, tip, or disagreement. We read every one.

  • Share it somewhere!

Back tomorrow with more.

Keep Reading